I am this close to doing to the open embrace the same thing I did to the cross. I am coming to the opinion that starting beginners in an open embrace just panders to peoples wariness of close connection.
Yes the mechanics1 of the movement may appear more daunting but they are actually easier. There is no space for error in the close embrace. There is only one place for your foot to go. There is only one place for your weight to be. I know it sounds as though I’m expecting people to get it on their first go, but I’m not. I want to reduce the possibilities and the variance so they get there quicker.
1This raised a giggle when I used the phrase “if the mechanics allow” in response to a question, suggesting the image of two oily overalled individuals on the edge of the dance floor granting and refusing permission for different movements.
Hola Limerick!
I’m in complete agreement. I think close embrace should be introduced thirty minutes into the first class. If there are students who really, really can’t deal with the close contact of close embrace, perhaps there are other teachers for them, or perhaps they could even remain in class if you were willing to have a separate, open embrace “thread” going with one or two couples. I’ve done that before with some success.
Let us know how it turns out.
Take care,
Alex
I’m taking the position of encouraging the close embrace rather than standing at the head of the class declaring like some Prussian army staff sergeant that “ve shall now assume ze close embrace”. There shall be a gentle impulsion towards closing the distance for those that don’t get it immediately.